When we encounter “impossible” realities, we actually really need to pay attention to what we discover. The layers would not be visible as the surface disturbing critters would cause the topsoil and sea floors to mix and destroy the lines of demarcation over the supposed millions of years when the strata was slowly building up.Only fools try to fit everything into a narrow prepackaged reality that explains everything away in a nice neat wrapper. The it takes "millions of years" Old Earth scenarios have problems when bioturbatation would interfere with the demarcation we see when we look at rocks and road cuts today. In the flood of Noah we would expect to see some, a few or one of the methods I mentioned depositing animals to be fossilized in the current strata that is being deposited.ĭemarcation is exactly what a flood would produce as there would be a rapid deposit of sediment whether it be from settlement, a wave, mudslide etc. Hydrodynamic selectivity would be the sorting and deposition of animals in flood waters dependent on their weight, density, bloating etc. The "differential escape idea" replies on not actually thinking about what it is saying.ĭifferential escape would involve the ability of one animal to escape the sediment, mud laden advancing waters and another not. And why were the birds not at the top? How can anyone think sloths will be able to escape the advancing waters better than any bird? It ignores the fact that some dinosaurs were very fast (velociraptors for example), and some mammals are very slow (sloths for example). It supposes all amphibians are slower than reptiles, and they are all slower than birds, who are all slower than mammals. The differential escape idea is based on very generalised ideas of the main animal types. So the flowering plants could outrun the dinosaurs. I note you completely ducked these questions: Can you explain why no flowering plants are found in strata below the cretaceous? And no dinosaurs above the cretaceous? Oh, wait, here it is in your reply to rossum. It is not pristine, but it is pretty good.Īnd evolution can explain it. It was certainly not long before when the Tiktaali that was fossilised was around. What do you think that proves? No one claims to know exactly when the first amphibians appeared. Well, a ten-year-old boy claimed it was entrapped in coal.
0 kommentar(er)
